Office for Civil Rights

Goal: To ensure equal access to education for all students through the vigorous enforcement of civil rights.

Relationship of Program to Volume 1, Department-wide Objectives: OCR is the principal office within ED that enforces federal civil rights laws. OCR also supports ED Strategic Plan Goals 1, 2, and 3 by ensuring equal access to education to enable all students to achieve high standards. By definition, "all students" in the ED Strategic Plan means students from all backgrounds regardless of race, national origin, color, disability, age, or gender.

FY 2000--$71,200,000

FY 2001--$76,000,000 (Requested budget)

**Impact on Students**

Objective 1: To Eliminate Discriminatory Educational Practices Within Schools.

Indicator 1.1 Increased compliance: The number of recipients of federal funds (e.g., school districts, postsecondary institutions, and state educational agencies) that change policies, procedures, or practices to comply with federal civil rights laws will increase.

Targets and Performance Data

Assessment of Progress

Sources and Data Quality

Year Actual Performance Performance Targets

Status: Target met.

Explanation: FY 1998, 1,378 recipients—consisting of approximately 1,013 school districts, 22 state education agencies (with 2,936 school districts, 233 postsecondary institutions), and 2 state systems of higher education—changed policies, practices, and procedures to comply with federal civil rights law.

FY 1999, 1,563 recipients – consisting of approximately 1,152 school districts, 5 state educational agencies (with 6,670 school districts), 403 postsecondary institutions, and 2 state systems of higher education (with 139 post secondary institutions) – changed policies, practices, and procedures to comply with federal civil rights laws.

* Meeting the targets is contingent on complaint workload and funding.

Source: Annual data from OCR Case Information System, 1999.

Frequency: Annually

Next Update: 2000

Validation Procedure: ED Data Quality Attestation Process and ED Standards for Evaluating Program Performance Indicators.

Limitations of Data and Planned

Improvements: OCR chose to measure compliance at the point of case resolution rather than at the end of monitoring. In doing so, we recognize that we are measuring the extent of influence of the agreement to effect change, rather than accomplished change.

While this indicator places equal value on all recipients, it is important to note that changes to policies, procedures, and practices at the state or district-wide level have a more systemic impact than those made at a school-based level.

Planned Improvements – Replace CIS with a more user friendly and less labor-intensive system. The system will have the capacity to link CIS data to specific case files, which will improve the validity of the data. In addition, OCR will move CIS to a platform that is compatible with the Department’s IT environment.

FY 1998:

1,378

Baseline Year

FY 1999:

1,563

Increase over 1,378*

FY 2000:

Increase over 1,563*

FY 2001:

Increase over FY 2000*

 

Indicator 1.2 Number of students affected: the estimated number of students positively affected by OCR's work will increase.

Targets and Performance Data

Assessment of Progress

Sources and Data Quality

Year Actual Performance Performance Targets

Status: Target met.

Explanation: This indicator expands on 1.1’s results. It demonstrates the number of students positively affected by improved access to equal educational opportunity when recipients change policies, practices, and procedures to eliminate or prevent civil rights problems.

 

* Meeting the targets is contingent on complaint workload and funding.

Source: Annual data from OCR's Case Information System, 1999.

Frequency: Annually

Next Update: 2000

Validation Procedure: ED Data Quality Attestation Process and ED Standards for Evaluating Program Performance Indicators.

Limitations of Data and Planned

Improvements: Student enrollment data used by OCR to calculate student impact is the most current data available to the recipient.

OCR counts student impact at the point of case resolution rather than at the end of monitoring because case resolution is the point in case processing that provides the most reliable, available, contemporaneous information for making meaningful program management decisions within the budget cycle. In doing so, we recognize that we are measuring the extent of influence of the agreement to effect change, rather than accomplished change.

We are careful to count only the students who we expect to directly experience change through the implementation of a resolution agreement. In some instances, the numbers are small, such as the resolution of a gifted and talented case or one that involves only English-language learners. The resolution of a disability complaint often affects one student. Alternatively, the numbers can be large such as the resolution of a sexual harassment case that involves training all staff and students on the implementation of a new policy.

Planned Improvements – Replace CIS with a more user friendly and less labor-intensive system. The system will have the capacity to link CIS data to specific case files, which will improve the validity of the data. In addition, OCR will move CIS to a platform that is compatible with the Department’s IT environment.

FY 1998:

5,900,000

Baseline Year

FY 1999:

6,571,725

Increase over 5,900,000*

FY 2000:

Increase over 6,571,725* 

FY 2001:

 Increase over FY 2000*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Empowerment of Parents and Students**

Objective 2: To Teach Parents and Students How to Resolve Problems of Securing Equal Access to High-Quality Education.

Indicator 1.2 Number of students affected: the estimated number of students positively affected by OCR's work will increase. 

Targets and Performance Data

Assessment of Progress

Sources and Data Quality

Year

 Actual Performance Performance Targets

Status: Baseline established.

Explanation: A parental partnership is established when OCR facilitates a collaboration between parents and schools to achieve ongoing civil rights compliance without OCR’s continued involvement.

* Meeting the targets is contingent on complaint workload and funding.

 

Source: Annual data from OCR Case Information System, 1999.

Frequency: Annually

Next Update: 2000

Validation Procedure: ED Data Quality Attestation Process and ED Standards for Evaluating Program Performance Indicators.

Limitations of Data and Planned

Improvements:

OCR’s conservative approach to measuring parent partnerships generated by OCR’s activities results in an undercount of potential benefits to students. We only count a parent partnership when we validate that a measurable result for students has occurred.

Planned Improvements – Replace CIS with a more user friendly and less labor-intensive system. The system will have the capacity to link CIS data to specific case files, which will improve the validity of the data. In addition, OCR will move CIS to a platform that is compatible with the Department’s IT environment.

FY 1999:

 18

Baseline Year

FY 2000:

 

Increase over 18*

FY 2001:

 

Increase over FY 2000*

**Efficient Utilization of Resources**

Objective 3: To Obtain Results by the Efficient Management of Civil Rights Compliance Activities.

Indicator 3.1 Resolution of complaints: eighty percent [80%] of the complaints are resolved within 180 days of receipt.

Targets and Performance Data

Assessment of Progress

Sources and Data Quality

Year

Actual Performance

Performance Targets

Status: Target met.

Explanation: A key factor contributing to OCR’s success in prompt complaint resolution is the ability to establish a target date for resolving each case on its own merit in an appropriate and timely way. Informed by experience in case resolution and given adequate funding, OCR determined that approximately 80% of its cases could be resolved in 180 days or less. Twenty per cent of OCR’s cases are so large in scope and complexity that the time needed to resolve these cases exceeds 180 days. These circumstances are not expected to change in the foreseeable future. Consequently, OCR does not anticipate changing its performance targets.

Source: Annual data from OCR Case Information System and analysis of complaint workload, 1999.

Frequency: Annually

Next Update: 2000

Validation Procedure: ED Data Quality Attestation Process and ED Standards for Evaluating Program Performance Indicators.

Limitations of Data and Planned

Improvements: Planned Improvements – Replace CIS with a more user friendly and less labor-intensive system. The system will have the capacity to link CIS data to specific case files, which will improve the validity of the data. In addition, OCR will move CIS to a platform that is compatible with the Department’s IT environment.

1997:

80%

1998:

81%

1999:

80%

80%

2000:

80%

2001:

80%

Key Strategies

Strategies continued from 1999

New or Strengthened Strategies

How This Program Coordinates with Other Federal Activities

Challenges to Achieving Program Goal

Indicator Changes

From two years old Annual plan (FY 1999)

Adjusted

Dropped

From last year's Annual Plan (FY 2000)

Adjusted – None.

Dropped – None.

New

 

Last Modified: 01/10/2020