A r c h i v e d I n f o r m a t i o n
William D. Ford Direct Loan Program: Myths and Facts
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| What Critics Say the | What the Program Really Does |
| Program Does * | |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Hires hundreds of new | The Department is planning on |
| bureaucrats at the | making significant reductions in |
| Department of Education. | both total staff and staff needed |
| | to manage and operate the student |
| | loan programs. Between 1995 and |
| | 1999, staff needed to operate the |
| | Direct Loan and FFEL programs is |
| | expected to decline from 809 to 732 |
| | while total ED staff is expected to |
| | decline from 5,131 to 4,698. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Institutes a federal | Both FFEL and Direct Loans are |
| takeover of the program's | federally managed programs the cost |
| funding and management. | of which are paid for by the |
| | federal government. Direct lending |
| | merely eliminates useless middlemen |
| | greatly simplifying administration |
| | and saving taxpayers billions of |
| | dollars. Under Direct Loans, the |
| | vast majority of work will still be |
| | conducted by private contractors, |
| | many of whom will be the same |
| | organizations currently conducting |
| | this work in the FFEL program. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Issue top-down mandates and | On the contrary, Direct Loans |
| rules for students and | provides much greater flexibility |
| colleges. | to schools to manage their loan |
| | programs so as to better serve |
| | borrowers. One of the primary |
| | reasons schools want to participate |
| | in the Direct Loan program is the |
| | freedom and control it gives them |
| | over their financial aid operation. |
| | The overwhelming satisfaction |
| | expressed by participating schools |
| | is evidence that the program |
| | delivers on this promise. In |
| | addition, all regulations issued in |
| | the Direct Loan program were |
| | negotiated with institutions |
| | through the negotiated rulemaking |
| | process. |
| | |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Burdens colleges with more | Direct Loans is less burdensome and |
| regulations and eliminates | provides greater incentives for |
| performance incentives. | high performance than FFEL. Due to |
| | the additional responsibilities |
| | given to schools under the Direct |
| | Loan program, they are subject to |
| | some additional regulations. |
| | However, schools are compensated |
| | for this burden (schools receive a |
| | $10 fee for preparing the |
| | promissory note) and the vast |
| | majority find it much less |
| | burdensome then the FFEL program. |
| | All Direct Loan contracts have |
| | performance incentives built in. |
| | This is in contrast to FFEL where |
| | lenders make large profits |
| | regardless of their performance. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Introduces open-ended | In both Direct Loans and FFEL, the |
| budgets based on political | cost to the Government is based on |
| objectives. | loan volume and interest rates. By |
| | replacing higher cost private |
| | capital with Government funds, the |
| | Direct Loan program saves taxpayers |
| | billions of dollars. Our savings |
| | estimates are consistent with those |
| | reached independently by the non- |
| | partisan Congressional Budget |
| | Office. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Eliminates private sector | We encourage competition in the |
| competition in the student | Direct Loan program. All contracts |
| loan industry. | to help operate the Direct Loan |
| | program are competitively awarded |
| | based on the offeror providing the |
| | greatest value to the Government. |
| | Our only consideration is what is |
| | in the best interest of students |
| | and taxpayers. This in contrast to |
| | the FFEL program where there is no |
| | requirement that contractors be |
| | competitively selected. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Abolishes the role of states | The vast majority of work in the |
| and the private sector in | Direct Loan program will be |
| student credit programs. | conducted by private contractors-- |
| | many of whom will be the same |
| | organizations currently involved in |
| | the FFEL program. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Replaces competing local, | The Direct Loan program is not |
| private customer-service | centrally administered but rather |
| organizations with one | relies on thousands of schools and |
| federal bureaucracy. | allows them to determine how best |
| | to serve their students. This is |
| | in contrast to lenders who have no |
| | real involvement or interest in the |
| | student. In terms of servicing |
| | loans, ED's contractors will be |
| | competing based on how well they |
| | serve borrowers. Those that fail |
| | to continue to perform at |
| | acceptable levels will be |
| | terminated. This compares to the |
| | FFEL program where there is no |
| | incentive to provide high quality |
| | service to borrowers and loans are |
| | sold at the lender's convenience. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
| Forces the Internal Revenue | Apart from offsets against tax |
| Service to collect student | refunds, the IRS has no current |
| loans and imposes new wage | role in the collection of student |
| reporting burdens. | loans and there are no changes in |
| | wage reporting requirements created |
| | by the Direct Loan program. IRS' |
| | only involvement in the Direct Loan |
| | program is to provide income data, |
| | with borrower's permission, to the |
| | Department for those borrowers |
| | choosing income-contingent |
| | repayment. |
+------------------------------+-------------------------------------+
* Taken from the May 9, 1995 statement of William Hansen,
submitted to the House Subcommittee on Government Management,
Information and Technology, Government Reform and Oversight Committee.