A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

The Need for Theory

A key contribution to the advancement of Goal 2 is likely to be the design and support of research that informs educators and the public about those aspects of students' experiences that determine whether or not these students graduate from or complete secondary school. In this light, steps are needed to move the field away from the atheoretical stance which has characterized much of the work to date, and in the direction of developing and advancing theoretical concepts that treat retention, graduation, and completion as consequences of a dynamic interaction of such variables as student characteristics, school context, occupational prospects, and cultural influences. There are a number of "big ideas" that might drive a national research agenda on dropouts. These could include:

Social Capital

Achievement Motivation

Social Bonding

Authentic Education

These theories, among others like them, are dynamic rather than static. That is, they represent dropouts as students who are part of a social world and who interact with the people and institutions that surround them. As such, the theories offer a rationale for dropout programs based on the motivating properties of student life, rather than the unexamined assumptions that accompany mere membership in the at-risk categories. Accordingly, theories such as these offer an opportunity to replace the "head counting" and descriptive statistics that have to date characterized both research on dropouts and dropout prevention with explanations of behavior that offer a far more powerful and sophisticated rationale for future research and the design of dropout prevention programs.

What Do We Need to Know? Table of Contents References


[ Home ]