A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

References

Apple, M. W. (1982).

Education and power. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Apple, M.W. (1983).

Curricular form and the logic of technical control. In M. Apple and L. Weis (Eds.) Ideology and the practice of schooling. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Ballinger, C. E., Kirshenbaum, N. & Poimbeauf, R.P. (1987).

The year-round school: Where learning never stops. Bloomington, IL: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

Ben-Peretz, M. (1990).

Perspectives on time in education. In M. Ben-Peretz & & R. Bromme (Eds.) The nature of time in schools (pp. 64-77). New York: Teachers College Press.

Berliner, D. (1987).

Simple views of effective teaching and a simple theory of classroom instruction. In D.C. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.) Talks to teachers (pp. 93-110). New York: Random House.

Berliner, D. (1990).

What's all the fuss about instructional time? In M. Ben-Peretz & & R. Bromme (Eds.) The nature of time in schools (3-35). New York: Teachers College Press.

Bird, T. & Little, J. W. (1986).

How schools organize the teaching occupation. Elementary School Journal, 86, 493-511.

Blanchard, K.H. & Johnson, S., (1982).

The one minute manager. New York: Morrow.

Boles, K.C. (1990).

School restructuring: A case study in teacher empowerment (Occa sional Paper No. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Brandt, R. (1982).

On improving teacher effectiveness: A conversation with David Berliner. Educational Leadership, 40, 12-15.

Brekke, N. R. (1991).

Year round education: Does it cost more? Oxnard, CA: Oxnard School District.

Brophy, J. & Good, T.L. (1986).

Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (ed.) Handbook of Research on Teaching: 3rd Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

Cambone, J., (1990).

Tipping the balance. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 217-236.

Cambone, J., (forthcoming).

Teaching troubled children: A case study in effective classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Cambone, J., Weiss, C.H., & Wyeth, A. (1992).

We're not programmed for this: An exploration of the variance between the way teachers think and the concept of shared decision making in high schools (Occasional Paper No. 17). Cambridge,MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.

Campbell, R.J. (1985).

Developing the primary curriculum. Eastbourne: Cassells.

Carle, E. (1989).

The very hungry caterpillar. New York: Scholastic Books.

Carriedo, R.A. & Goren, P.D. (1989).

Year-round education through multitrack schools (Report No. 10). San Francisco: Far West Laboratory.

Carroll, J.B. (1985).

A model of school learning. In C.W. Fisher & D.C. Berliner (Eds.), Perspectives on instructional time. New York: Longman. Reprinted from Teachers College Record, 64, 1963, 723-733.

Castle, S. (1992).

National Education Associations Master in Learning Project. Unpublished Raw Data.

Connelly, M. & Clandinin, J. (1990).

The cyclic temporal structure of schooling. In M. Ben-Peretz & & R. Bromme (Eds.) The nature of time in schools (pp. 36-63). New York: Teachers College Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990).

Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.

Funkhouser, J.E., Humphrey, D.C., Panton, K.L.M., & Rosenthal, E.D., (1992).

Research Review: Educational uses of time. Washington, D.C.: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.

Habermas, J. (1970).

Towards a rational society. London: Heinemann.

Hall, E.T. (1984).

The dance of life. New York: Anchor Press.

Hargreaves, A. (1990).

Teachers' work and the politics of time and space. Qualitative Studies in Education, 3, 303-320.

Hawkins, D. (1974).

The informed vision. New York: Agathon Press.

Hawking, S. (1988).

A brief history of time. New York: Bantam Books.

Heidegger, M. (1962).

Being and Time. London: SCM Press.

Impact II: The Teachers Network. (1991).

The Teachers Vision on The Future of Education: A Challenge to the Nation. Mechanicsburg, PA: Fry Communications.

Johnson, S.M. (1990).

Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. New York: Basic Books

Keyes, R. (1987).

Timelock: How life got so hectic and what you can do about it. New York: Harper/Collins.

Kidder, T. (1989).

Among schoolchildren. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Kozol, J. (1991).

Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown Publishers.

Latus, T. (1988).

I, Sam, and science. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry, 3, 3-11.

Lieberman, A., Darling-Hammond, L., & Zuckerman, D., (1991a).

Early lessons in restructuring schools. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Lieberman, A., Zuckerman, D., Wilkie, A., Smith, E., Barinas, N., & Hegert, L. (1991b).

Early lessons in restructuring schools: case studies of schools of tomorrow . . . today. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, Schools and Teaching, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Livingston, C., & Castle, S. (1992, April).

Restructuring Schools: New Tensions and Dilemmas for Teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

McLaughlin, M.W. (1992).

What Matters Most in Teachers' Workplace Context? (pp. 92-139). Stanford: Stanford University, Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching.

Muncey, D. (1991).

[Educational Reform]. Unpublished manuscript. Providence: Brown University, School Ethnography Project.

Muncey, D., & McQuillan, P. (1991).

Some observations on the possibility of major restructuring in American schools: an ethnographic perspective (Working Paper No. 3). Providence: Brown University, School Ethnography Project.

Muncey, D., and McQuillan, P. (1992a).

Sustaining school change: case studies from the coalition of essential schools. Providence: Brown University, School Ethnography Project.

Muncey, D. and McQuillan P. (1992b).

Teachers talk about coalition reforms at their schools (Working Paper No.7). Providence: Brown University, School Ethnography Project.

National Education Commission on Time and Learning, (1992).

Summary of the first hearing. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Rosenshine, B. (1979).

Content, time, and direct instruction. In P. Peterson and H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching: Concepts, findings, and implications. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

Sarason, S. (1971).

The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Sarason, S. (1993).

The case for change: Rethinking the preparation of educators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schön, D. (1983).

The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

Sizer, T. (1984).

Horace's Compromise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Talbert, J., and McLaughlin, M. (1992).

Understanding teaching in context (pp. 92- 149). Stanford: Stanford University Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching.

Walker, G. (1992, October).

Time to teach, time to learn: The quality and adequacy of time devoted to study and learning. Paper presented to the National Education Commission Hearing on Time and Learning. North Carolina.

Watts, G, and Castle, S.(1992).

The time dilemma in school restructuring. Changing Schools from Within: Tensions and Dilemma in School Restructuring Symposium. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

Weiss, C.H. (1993).

Interests and ideologies in educational reform: Changing the venue of decision making in the high school. (Occasional Paper No. 19). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Education.

Weiss, C.H., Cambone, J. & Wyeth, A. (1992).

Trouble in paradise: Teacher conflicts in shared decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly,3, 350-367.

Werner, W. (1988).

Program implementation and experienced time. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 34, 90-108.

Zerubavel, E. (1981).

Hidden rhythms: Schedules and calendars in social life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Zerubavel, E. (1985).

The seven day circle: The history and meaning of the week. New York: Free Press.

[Conclusions]

[New Boundaries for School-Based Management: The High Involvement Model]