A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n
US Department of Education
Assuring Quality & FinancingCyber University vs. Site-Based UniversityNew Initiatives
What We Heard From StakeholdersOPE Actions

Theme 4

Students Working at Computers Assuring Quality, Access, and Financing

Although these new relationships are important in enabling development, they are raising significant questions. How will these partnerships alter traditional assumptions about the nature of and values inherent in higher education? For example, the partnerships could increase the digital divide between the institutions that can afford sophisticated applications of technology in instruction and those that cannot.

OPE is determined to see that doesn’t happen. The OPE programs to aid developing institutions [Titles III and V of the Higher Education Act (HEA)] support institutions that enroll many of our minority and disadvantaged students. OPE is working with grantees to help them use their funds to build the infrastructure for access to the Internet. The cost of technology is high, but students at all our institutions need access to essential computing resources.

In addition to the digital divide issue, all these changes raise new challenges concerning the two long-standing and primary concerns of the federal government: quality and access.

Quality assurance in American higher education has been predominantly the province of regional and national accrediting agencies, membership organizations that rely on self-examination and peer review to determine whether institutions meet minimum standards of quality and to encourage improvement. OPE’s role is predicated on its authority to determine which postsecondary institutions are eligible for HEA Title IV student aid. The institutions eligible to offer federal student aid and to receive other federal funds must meet acceptable levels of quality. OPE recognizes accrediting agencies that have rigorous procedures for determining which institutions meet their standards and thereby become eligible for Title IV student aid.

Regional and national accrediting agencies are faced with the challenge of accurately evaluating postsecondary education over the Internet. OPE supports their efforts. For our part, we need to ensure that the criteria for recognizing accrediting agencies do not present obstacles to the changes accrediting agencies are making in their standards and processes.

^  

< >

homeintrocontentsthemesstrategiesactionsconclusions